The case for virtual register machines

  • Authors:
  • Brian Davis;Andrew Beatty;Kevin Casey;David Gregg;John Waldron

  • Affiliations:
  • Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland;Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland;Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland;Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland;Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 2003 workshop on Interpreters, virtual machines and emulators
  • Year:
  • 2003

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Virtual machines (VMs) are a popular target for language implementers. Conventional wisdom tells us that virtual stack architectures can be implemented with an interpreter more efficiently, since the location of operands is implicit in the stack pointer. In contrast, the operands of register machine instructions must be specified explicitly. In this paper, we present a working system for translating stack-based Java virtual machine (JVM) code to a simple register code. We describe the translation process, the complicated parts of the JVM which make translation more difficult, and the optimisations needed to eliminate copy instructions. Experimental results show that a register format reduces the number of executed instructions by 34.88%, while increasing the number of bytecode loads by an average of 44.81%. Overall, this corresponds to an increase of 2.32 loads for each dispatch removed. We believe that the high cost of dispatches makes register machines attractive even at the cost of increased loads.