Can the field of MIS be disciplined?
Communications of the ACM
Empirical research in information systems: the practice of relevance
MIS Quarterly - Special issue on intensive research in information systems
Information systems curriculum recommendations for the 80s: undergraduate and graduate programs
Communications of the ACM
Information Systems Conceptual Foundations: Looking Backward and Forward
HOIT '00 Proceedings of the IFIP TC9 WG9.3 International Conference on Home Oriented Informatics and Telematics,: Information, Technology and Society
The repertory grid: "discovering" a 50-year-old research technique
SAICSIT '05 Proceedings of the 2005 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper provides a critical discussion of the ongoing concern of Information Systems (IS) academics on the status of IS as an academic discipline. The focal claim of the argument is that the status of IS as an 'academic discipline' is not an ontological or an epistemological question but rather a political one. In defending this claim the paper will draw on the work of Foucault, in particular his discussion on the relation between power and knowledge. The paper will conclude that the advice given by Paul (2002) and others may be appropriate but for very different reasons. It will claim that it is equally important, if not more so, to know the reasons why claims to legitimacy may Succeed or not, for such claims to be effective as a political programme.