Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference
Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: networks of plausible inference
Knowledge acquisition: principles and guidelines
Knowledge acquisition: principles and guidelines
Index expression belief networks for information disclosure
International Journal of Expert Systems
Knowledge engineering: principles and methods
Data & Knowledge Engineering - Special jubilee issue: DKE 25
Developing a Decision-Theoretic Network for a Congenital Heart Disease
AIME '97 Proceedings of the 6th Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Medicine in Europe
How to elicit many probabilities
UAI'99 Proceedings of the Fifteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Elicitation of probabilities for belief networks: combining qualitative and quantitative information
UAI'95 Proceedings of the Eleventh conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Properties of Sensitivity Analysis of Bayesian Belief Networks
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Probability elicitation for belief networks: issues to consider
The Knowledge Engineering Review
Evaluating the difference between graph structures in Gaussian Bayesian networks
Expert Systems with Applications: An International Journal
Automated interviews on clinical case reports to elicit directed acyclic graphs
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Probabilities for a probabilistic network: a case study in oesophageal cancer
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Editorial: Bayesian networks in biomedicine and health-care
Artificial Intelligence in Medicine
Information Sciences: an International Journal
Decision support system for Warfarin therapy management using Bayesian networks
Decision Support Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
When building a Bayesian belief network, usually a large number of probabilities have to be assessed by experts in the domain of application. Experience shows that experts are often reluctant to assess all probabilities required, feeling that they are unable to give assessments with a high level of accuracy. We argue that the elicitation of probabilities from experts can be supported to a large extent by iteratively performing sensitivity analyses of the belief network in the making, starting with rough, initial assessments. Since it gives insight into which probabilities require a high level of accuracy and which do not, performing a sensitivity analysis allows for focusing further elicitation efforts. We propose an elicitation procedure in which, alternately, sensitivity analyses are performed and probability assessments refined, until satisfactory behaviour of the belief network is obtained, until the costs of further elicitation outweigh the benefits of higher accuracy or until higher accuracy can no longer be attained due to lack of knowledge.