Usability inspection methods
Take me home: designing safer in-vehicle navigation devices
CHI '09 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
A prototype of landmark-based car navigation using a full-windshield head-up display system
AMC '09 Proceedings of the 2009 workshop on Ambient media computing
A novel active heads-up display for driver assistance
IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, Part B: Cybernetics - Special issue on human computing
Simulators for driving safety study: a literature review
ICVR'07 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Virtual reality
A review of driver mental workload in driver-vehicle-environment system
IDGD'11 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Internationalization, design and global development
Evaluating the usability of a head-up display for selection from choice lists in cars
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
Exploring the back of the steering wheel: text input with hands on the wheel and eyes on the road
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This study investigates the effects of two different display modes head-up display (HUD) vs. head-down display (HDD) on the driving performance and psychological workload ratings of drivers operating commercial vehicles in Taiwan. Twelve commercial lorry drivers participated in a 2 (high/low driving load road) × 2 (head-up/head-down display) × 2 (different arrangements of display sequences used) mixed-factor driving simulation experiment. Participants were divided into two groups according to the level of driving load conditions within each driving load group; the participants were further divided into another 2 subgroups based on two arrangements of display sequences used. For each driving load condition, there were two 20-min driving simulation experiments, separated by a display sequence using head-up first and then head-down or vice versa. The subjects were asked to perform four tasks: "commercial goods delivery", "navigation", "speed detection and maintenance" and "response to an urgent event". Results indicated that for the first task, commercial goods delivery, the two display types showed no significant performance difference in terms of average accuracy rate. However, in terms of response time to an urgent event, it was faster with the HUD (with a low driving load-head-up vs. head-down: 1.0073 vs. 1.8684 s; with a high driving load--head-up vs. head-down: 1.3235 vs. 2.3274 s) and speed control was more consistent (having low speed variations) than with the HDD. In addition, using the HUD caused less mental stress for the drivers than the HDD and was easier for first-time users to become familiar with; with a high driving load, however, the difference between the two displays was not significant.