Reinventing Government in the Information Age
Reinventing Government in the Information Age
New technologies and institutional change in public administration
Social Science Computer Review - E-government
Unity in Diversity: An Analysis of Inter-governmental Cooperation in the Field of geoICT
EGOV '08 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic Government
Driver or Passenger? An Analysis of Citizen-Driven eGovernment
EGOV '08 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Electronic Government
Reference model for devolution in e-governance
Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Theory and practice of electronic governance
Proceedings of the 2009 Annual Research Conference of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists
Information systems in the public sector: The e-Government enactment framework
The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Infrastructure and standards in Thai digital government
Proceedings of the 2011 iConference
What role has scandinavian IS tradition in egovernment implementations
EGOV'06 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Electronic Government
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
E-Government and New Public Management (NPM) are two concepts that are often used in discussions about modernizing government. Both concepts refer to various forms of reform of the public sector and, at least to a certain degree, address the same problems public administration is nowadays confronted with (lack of accountability, underperformance and diminished level of legitimacy, to name a few).The fact that e-government and new public management address the same problems does not imply that the contents of these concepts indeed overlap. Both concepts comprise heterogeneous elements and multiple dimensions; intuitively, some of these elements may be understood as overlapping, but a clear conceptual framework indicating where new public management and E-government overlap and reinforce one another, is lacking.Based on theoretical and empirical evidence, a framework for classification of reforms is presented. The framework highlights various types of reforms, and identifies requirements for architectures and accountability routes in technological and institutional reforms.