Space-scale diagrams: understanding multiscale interfaces
CHI '95 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Critical zones in desert fog: aids to multiscale navigation
Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
PadPrints: graphical multiscale Web histories
Proceedings of the 11th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
Instrumental interaction: an interaction model for designing post-WIMP user interfaces
Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Context and interaction in zoomable user interfaces
AVI '00 Proceedings of the working conference on Advanced visual interfaces
Jazz: an extensible zoomable user interface graphics toolkit in Java
UIST '00 Proceedings of the 13th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
PhotoMesa: a zoomable image browser using quantum treemaps and bubblemaps
Proceedings of the 14th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
Ambient touch: designing tactile interfaces for handheld devices
Proceedings of the 15th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology
Visual User Interface for PDAs
IV '03 Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Information Visualization
DateLens: A fisheye calendar interface for PDAs
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Target acquisition in multiscale electronic worlds
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies - Special issue: Fitts law 50 years later: Applications and contributions from human-computer interaction
Acuité perceptive via une interface pseudo-haptique
IHM 2004 Proceedings of the 16th conference on Association Francophone d'Interaction Homme-Machine
Perceptive supplementation for an access to graphical interfaces
UAHCI'07 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Universal access in human computer interaction: coping with diversity
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this fundamental study, we compare two scaling methods by focusing on the subjects' strategies which are using a sensory substitution device. Method 1 consists in a reduction of the sensor size and its displacement speed. Here, speed reduction is obtained by a "human" movement reduction (hand speed reduction). Method 2 consists in a classical increase of the image dimension. The experimental device couples the pen on a graphics tablet with tactile sensory stimulators. These latter are activated when the sensor crosses the figure on the computer screen. This virtual sensor (square matrix composed of 16 elementary fields) is displaced when the pen, guided by a human hand displacements, moves on the graphics tablet. Even if it seems that there is no difference between the two methods, the results show that the recognition rate is closely dependent on the figure size and the strategies used by the subjects are more suitable for method 2 than the method 1. In fact, half of the subjects found that method 1 inhibits their movements and the majority of them don't feel the scaling effect, whereas this is clearly felt in method 2.