On the security of stepwise triangular systems

• Authors: Christopher Wolf;An Braeken;Bart Preneel
• Venue: Designs, Codes and Cryptography
• Year: 2006

In 2003 and 2004, Kasahara and Sakai suggested the two schemes RSE(2)PKC and RSSE(2)PKC, respectively. Both are examples of public key schemes based on $$\mathcal{M}$$ ultivariate $$\mathcal{Q}$$ uadratic equations. In this article, we first introduce Step-wise Triangular Schemes (STS) as a new class of $$\mathcal{M}$$ ultivariate $$\mathcal{Q}$$ uadratic public key schemes. These schemes have m equations, n variables, L steps or layers, r the number of equations and new variables per step and q the size of the underlying finite field $$\mathbb{F}$$ . Then, we derive two very efficient cryptanalytic attacks. The first attack is an inversion attack which computes the message/signature for given ciphertext/message in O(mn 3 Lq r + n 2 Lrq r ), the second is a structural attack which recovers an equivalent version of the secret key in O(mn 3 Lq r + mn 4) operations. As the legitimate user also has a workload growing with q r to recover a message/compute a signature, q r has to be small for efficient schemes and the attacks presented in this article are therefore efficient. After developing our theory, we demonstrate that both RSE(2)PKC and RSSE(2)PKC are special instances of STS and hence, fall to the attacks developed in our article. In particular, we give the solution for the crypto challenge proposed by Kasahara and Sakai. Finally, we demonstrate that STS cannot be the basis for a secure $$\mathcal{M}$$ ultivariate $$\mathcal{Q}$$ uadratic public key scheme by discussing all possible variations and pointing out their vulnerabilities.