Psychophysics for perception of (in)determinate art

  • Authors:
  • Christian Wallraven;Kathrin Kaulard;Cora Kürner;Robert Pepperell;Heinrich H. Bülthoff

  • Affiliations:
  • Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany;Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany;Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany;University of Wales Institute, Cardiff, UK;Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Tübingen, Germany

  • Venue:
  • Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The question of how humans perceive art and how the sensory percept is endowed with aesthetics by the human brain has continued to fascinate psychologists and artists alike. It seems, for example, rather easy for us to classify a work of art as either "abstract" or "representational". The artist Robert Pepperell recently has produced a series of paintings that seek to defy this classification: his goal was to convey "indeterminancy" in these paintings - scenes that at first glance look like they contain an object or belong to a certain genre but that upon closer examination escape a definite determination of their contents. Here, we report results from several psychophysical experiments using these artworks as stimuli, which seek to shed light on the perceptual processing of the degree of abstraction in images. More specifically, the task in these experiments was to categorize a briefly shown image as "abstract" or "representational". Stimuli included Pepperell's paintings each of which was paired with a similar representational work of art from several periods and several artistic genres. The results provide insights into the visual processes determining our perception of art and can also function as a "objective" validation for the intentions of the artist.