Aesthetic appraisal of art - from eye movements to computers

Authors:
C. Wallraven;D. Cunningham;J. Rigau;M. Feixas;M. Sbert
Affiliations:
Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics, Germany;WSI-GRIS, University of Tübingen, Germany;Graphics and Imaging Laboratory, University of Girona, Spain;Graphics and Imaging Laboratory, University of Girona, Spain;Graphics and Imaging Laboratory, University of Girona, Spain
Venue:
Computational Aesthetics'09 Proceedings of the Fifth Eurographics conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging
Year:
2009

Citing 5
Cited 3

An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications (2nd ed.)

An introduction to Kolmogorov complexity and its applications (2nd ed.)
2006 Special Issue: Modeling attention to salient proto-objects

Neural Networks
Psychophysics for perception of (in)determinate art

Proceedings of the 4th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization
Informational Aesthetics Measures

IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
Perceptual and computational categories in art

Computational Aesthetics'08 Proceedings of the Fourth Eurographics conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging

Image information in digital photography

ACCV'10 Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on Computer vision - Volume part II
Special Section on CANS: Emotional response and visual attention to non-photorealistic images

Computers and Graphics
Toward Auvers period: evolution of van Gogh's style

Computational Aesthetics'10 Proceedings of the Sixth international conference on Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

By looking at a work of art, an observer enters into a dialogue. In this work, we attempt to analyze this dialogue with both behavioral and computational tools. In two experiments, observers were asked to look at a large number of paintings from different art periods and to rate their visual complexity, or their aesthetic appeal. During these two tasks, their eye movements were recorded. The complexity and aesthetic ratings show clear preferences for certain artistic styles and were based on both low-level and high-level criteria. Eye movements reveal the time course of the aesthetic dialogue as observers try to interpret and understand the painting. Computational analyses of both the ratings (using measures derived from information theory) and the eye tracking data (using two models of saliency) showed that our computational tools are already able to explain some properties of this dialogue.