ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)
MULTIMEDIA '94 Proceedings of the second ACM international conference on Multimedia
The interactive performance of SLIM: a stateless, thin-client architecture
Proceedings of the seventeenth ACM symposium on Operating systems principles
Limits of wide-area thin-client computing
SIGMETRICS '02 Proceedings of the 2002 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on Measurement and modeling of computer systems
Windows NT Thin Client Solutions: Implementing Terminal Server and Citrix MetaFrame
Windows NT Thin Client Solutions: Implementing Terminal Server and Citrix MetaFrame
Server-Based Computing Opportunities
IT Professional
IEEE Internet Computing
The Performance of Remote Display Mechanisms for Thin-Client Computing
ATEC '02 Proceedings of the General Track of the annual conference on USENIX Annual Technical Conference
Web browsing performance of wireless thin-client computing
WWW '03 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web
Thin-Client computing for supporting the qos of streaming media in mobile devices
ICCSA'06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Computational Science and Its Applications - Volume Part II
Server-Based Computing Solution Based on Open Source Software
Information Systems Management
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we study how TCP and UDP flows interact with each other when the end system is a CPU resource constrained thin client. The problem addressed is twofold, 1) the throughput of TCP flows degrades severely in the presence of heavily loaded UDP flows 2) fairness and minimum QoS requirements of UDP are not maintained. First, we identify the factors affecting the TCP throughput by providing an in-depth analysis of end to end delay and packet loss variations. The results obtained from the first part leads us to our second contribution. We propose and study the use of an algorithm that ensures fairness across flows. The algorithm improves the performance of TCP flows in the presence of multiple UDP flows admitted under an admission algorithm and maintains the minimum QoS requirements of the UDP flows. The advantage of the algorithm is that it requires no changes to TCP/IP stack and control is achieved through receiver window control.