Four different perspectives on human-computer interaction
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies
The integration of computing and routine work
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS) - Special issue: selected papers from the conference on office information systems
Emotion & design: attractive things work better
interactions
User Interaction Design for Secure Systems
ICICS '02 Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Information and Communications Security
Technology as Experience
Social navigation as a model for usable security
SOUPS '05 Proceedings of the 2005 symposium on Usable privacy and security
To download or not to download: an examination of computer security decision making
interactions - A contradiction in terms?
When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges
Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
A sense of security in pervasive computing: is the light on when the refrigerator door is closed?
FC'07/USEC'07 Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Financial cryptography and 1st International conference on Usable Security
Experiencing security in interaction design
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Human Computer Interaction
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
While the domain of security dependent technologies brings new challenges to HCI research it seems that the results and breakthroughs of HCI have not been used in design of security dependent technologies. With exceptions, work in the research field of usable security may be criticized for focusing mainly on adjusting user behavior to behave securely. With our background in newer HCI perspectives we address secure interaction from the perspective of security technology as experience. We analyze a number of collected user stories to understand what happens when everyday users encounter security dependent technologies. We apply McCarthy & Wright's [12] experience framework to the security domain and our collected stories. We point out that there are significant differences between being secure and having a secure experience, and conclude that classical usable security, focus on people's immediate security experience, and the full focus on experience proposed by McCarthy & Wright lead to three very different interaction concerns, analytically and as regards design. We illustrate these differences by examples, and conclude with a discussion of how to advance the field of usable security.