A foundation for the study of group decision support systems
Management Science
“Computer support for meetings of groups working on unstructured problems: a field experiment"
Management Information Systems Quarterly
Groupware: some issues and experiences
Communications of the ACM
Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision-making
International Journal of Man-Machine Studies - Computer-supported cooperative work and groupware. Part 1
Rethinking Media Richness: Towards a Theory of Media Synchronicity
HICSS '99 Proceedings of the Thirty-Second Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences-Volume 1 - Volume 1
Effects of long-term use of video-communication technologies on the conversational process
Cognition, Technology and Work
Awareness and teamwork in computer-supported collaborations
Interacting with Computers
Remote conversations: the effects of mediating talk with technology
Human-Computer Interaction
Things to talk about when talking about things
Human-Computer Interaction
Network-aware support for mobile distributed teams
Computers in Human Behavior
A demands-resources model of work pressure in IT student task groups
Computers & Education
Revisiting Media Choice: A Behavioral Decision-Making Perspective
International Journal of e-Collaboration
Hi-index | 0.00 |
An experiment compared dyadic performance in a radio communication and a more sophisticated communication environment to face-to-face (FtF) meetings. Thirty-six dyads, working under low or high time-pressure conditions, needed to combine information and to produce a written plan. Teams working in the sophisticated communication environment collaborated from separate locations over a networked computer system allowing them to share a note-taking program, work in parallel, and exchange in real-time audio as well as video. Results revealed detrimental effects of time pressure on both team processes and outcomes, and supported our hypothesis that distributed teams can perform as well as FtF teams. No differences were found between FtF teams and teams working in the sophisticated communication environment on process and outcome measures, except for the quantity of performance: The sophisticated communication environment enabled distributed teams to work on the task more rapidly than their FtF counterparts. Radio teams produced plans of lower quality and were less satisfied with the quality of their planning process than FtF teams.