To Score or Not to Score? Tripling Insights for Participatory Design

Authors:
Michael Smuc;Eva Mayr;Tim Lammarsch;Wolfgang Aigner;Silvia Miksch;Johannes Gärtner
Affiliations:
Danube University Krems;Danube University Krems;Danube University Krems;Danube University Krems;Danube University Krems;Ximes
Venue:
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
Year:
2009

Citing 0
Cited 5

Mapping the users'problem solving strategies in the participatory design of visual analytics methods

USAB'10 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on HCI in work and learning, life and leisure: workgroup human-computer interaction and usability engineering
Many roads lead to Rome: mapping users' problem solving strategies

Proceedings of the 3rd BELIV'10 Workshop: BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization
Is your user hunting or gathering insights?: identifying insight drivers across domains

Proceedings of the 3rd BELIV'10 Workshop: BEyond time and errors: novel evaLuation methods for Information Visualization
A comparison of benchmark task and insight evaluation methods for information visualization

Information Visualization - Special issue on Evaluation for Information Visualization
Many roads lead to Rome: mapping users' problem-solving strategies

Information Visualization - Special issue on Evaluation for Information Visualization

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

For evaluating visual-analytics tools, many studies confine to scoring user insights into data. For participatory design of those tools, we propose a three-level methodology to make more out of users' insights. The Relational Insight Organizer (RIO) helps to understand how insights emerge and build on one each other.