Impact of progress feedback on task completion: first impressions matter
CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Discourse processing for explanatory essays in tutorial applications
SIGDIAL '02 Proceedings of the 3rd SIGdial workshop on Discourse and dialogue - Volume 2
AutoTutor: A simulation of a human tutor
Cognitive Systems Research
ITS '08 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Balancing Cognitive and Motivational Scaffolding in Tutorial Dialogue
ITS '08 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Learner characteristics and feedback in tutorial dialogue
EANL '08 Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications
What Students Expect May Have More Impact Than What They Know or Feel
Proceedings of the 2009 conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Building Learning Systems that Care: From Knowledge Representation to Affective Modelling
ACM Transactions on Interactive Intelligent Systems (TiiS) - Special issue on highlights of the decade in interactive intelligent systems
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education
DHM'13 Proceedings of the 4th international conference on Digital Human Modeling and Applications in Health, Safety, Ergonomics, and Risk Management: human body modeling and ergonomics - Volume Part II
Ecological content sequencing: from simulated students to an effective user study
International Journal of Learning Technology
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The primary goal of this study was to investigate the role of feedback in an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) with natural language dialogue. One core component of tutorial dialogue is feedback, which carries the primary burden of informing students of their performance. AutoTutor is an ITS with tutorial dialogue that was developed at the University of Memphis. This article addresses the effectiveness of two types of feedback (content & progress) while college students interact with AutoTutor on conceptual physics. Content feedback provides qualitative information about the domain content and its accuracy as it is covered in a tutoring session. Progress feedback is a quantitative assessment of the student's advancement through the material being covered (i.e., how far the student has come and how much farther they have to go). A factorial design was used that manipulated the presence or absence of both feedback categories (content & progress). Each student interacted with one of four different versions of AutoTutor that varied the type of feedback. Data analyses showed significant effects of feedback on learning and motivational measures, supporting the notion that “content matters” and the adage “no pain, no gain.”