Balancing Cognitive and Motivational Scaffolding in Tutorial Dialogue

  • Authors:
  • Kristy Elizabeth Boyer;Robert Phillips;Michael Wallis;Mladen Vouk;James Lester

  • Affiliations:
  • Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University,;Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, and Applied Research Associates, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina, USA;Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, and Applied Research Associates, Inc., Raleigh, North Carolina, USA;Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University,;Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University,

  • Venue:
  • ITS '08 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems
  • Year:
  • 2008

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

A key challenge in the design of tutorial dialogue systems is identifying tutorial strategies that can effectively balance the tradeoffs between cognitive and affective student outcomes. This balance is problematic because the precise nature of the interdependence between cognitive and affective strategies is not well understood. Furthermore, previous studies suggest that some cognitive and motivational goals are at odds with one another because a tutorial strategy designed to maximize one may negatively impact the other. This paper reports on a tutorial dialogue study that investigates motivational strategies and cognitive feedback. It was found that the choice of corrective tutorial strategy makes a significant difference in the outcomes of both student learning gains and self-efficacy gains.