On stable social laws and qualitative equilibria
Artificial Intelligence
An automated negotiator for an international crisis
Eighteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence
An agenda-based framework for multi-issue negotiation
Artificial Intelligence
Bargaining with incomplete information
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Cooperative negotiation in autonomic systems using incremental utility elicitation
UAI'03 Proceedings of the Nineteenth conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
AutoMed: an automated mediator for bilateral negotiations under time constraints
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Opponent modelling in automated multi-issue negotiation using Bayesian learning
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 1
Analysis of Negotiation Dynamics
CIA '07 Proceedings of the 11th international workshop on Cooperative Information Agents XI
A formal analysis of interest-based negotiation
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
Affective negotiation support systems
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Smart Environments
An empirical study of interest-based negotiation
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
The impact of available information on negotiation results
Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence
AutoMed: an automated mediator for multi-issue bilateral negotiations
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Efficient bidding strategies for Cliff-Edge problems
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Many day-to-day tasks require negotiation, mostly under conditions of incomplete information. In particular, the opponent's exact tradeoff between different offers is usually unknown. We propose a model of an automated negotiation agent capable of negotiating with a bounded rational agent (and in particular, against humans) under conditions of incomplete information. Although we test our agent in one specific domain, the agent's architecture is generic; thus it can be adapted to any domain as long as the negotiators' preferences can be expressed in additive utilities. Our results indicate that the agent played significantly better, including reaching a higher proportion of agreements, than human counterparts when playing one of the sides, while when playing the other side there was no significant difference between the results of the agent and the human players.