Plausible motion simulation for computer graphics animation
Proceedings of the Eurographics workshop on Computer animation and simulation '96
Controlling physics in realistic character animation
Communications of the ACM
Sampling plausible solutions to multi-body constraint problems
Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG)
Perception of Human Motion With Different Geometric Models
IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics
Evaluating the visual fidelity of physically based animations
ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers
Perceptual metrics for character animation: sensitivity to errors in ballistic motion
ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers
Many-worlds browsing for control of multibody dynamics
ACM SIGGRAPH 2007 papers
Effect of scenario on perceptual sensitivity to errors in animation
Proceedings of the 5th symposium on Applied perception in graphics and visualization
Proceedings of the 17th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
Perception based real-time dynamic adaptation of human motions
MIG'10 Proceedings of the Third international conference on Motion in games
Push it real: perceiving causality in virtual interactions
ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG) - SIGGRAPH 2012 Conference Proceedings
Evaluating the plausibility of edited throwing animations
EUROSCA'12 Proceedings of the 11th ACM SIGGRAPH / Eurographics conference on Computer Animation
Evaluating the plausibility of edited throwing animations
Proceedings of the ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation
Believability in simplifications of large scale physically based simulation
Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Applied Perception
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
A deeper understanding of what makes animation perceptually plausible would benefit a number of applications, such as approximate collision detection and goal-directed animation. In a series of psychophysical experiments, we examine how measurements of perceptual sensitivity in realistic physical simulations compare to similar measurements done in more abstract settings. We find that participant tolerance for certain types of errors is significantly higher in a realistic snooker scenario than in the abstract test settings previously used to examine those errors. By contrast, we find tolerance for errors displayed in realistic but more neutral environments was not different from tolerance for those errors in abstract settings. Additionally, we examine the interaction of auditory and visual cues in determining participant sensitivity to spatiotemporal errors in rigid body collisions. We find that participants are predominantly affected by visual cues. Finally, we find that tolerance for spatial gaps during collision events is constant for a wide range of viewing angles if the effect of foreshortening and occlusion caused by the viewing angle is taken into account.