Evaluating the quality of dialogical argumentation in CSCL: moving beyond an analysis of formal structure

  • Authors:
  • Douglas Clark;Victor Sampson;Armin Weinberger;Gijsbert Erkens

  • Affiliations:
  • College of Education, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ;College of Education, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ;Ludwig-Maximilans-Universität, Munich, Germany;Research Centre Learning in Interaction, Utrecht University, Utrecht, NL

  • Venue:
  • CSCL'07 Proceedings of the 8th iternational conference on Computer supported collaborative learning
  • Year:
  • 2007

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Over the last decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online learning environments to promote argumentative discourse between students. This symposium examines some of the diverse ways researchers have attempted to examine how students engage in argumentation and to assess the effectiveness of CSCL environments in fostering productive argumentation. The papers presented as part of this symposium will focus on four different categories of analytic frameworks: (1) nature and function of contributions within the dialog, (2) nature of reasoning, (3) conceptual quality, and (4) patterns and trajectories of participant interaction. Example analytic frameworks from each category are presented in detail rich enough to illustrate their nature and structure. Synthetic discussions of each category consider the frameworks in light of the underlying theoretical perspectives on argumentation, pedagogical goals, and online environmental structures.