Operations Research
Probabilistic inference and influence diagrams
Operations Research
Negotiation analysis: a characterization and review
Management Science
Making Hard Decisions with Decisiontools Suite
Making Hard Decisions with Decisiontools Suite
UAI '00 Proceedings of the 16th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
Graphical Models for Game Theory
UAI '01 Proceedings of the 17th Conference in Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence
Multi-agent algorithms for solving graphical games
Eighteenth national conference on Artificial intelligence
Influence Diagrams for Team Decision Analysis
Decision Analysis
Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs
Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs
Probabilistic inference in influence diagrams
UAI'98 Proceedings of the Fourteenth conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence
Decision Analysis
From the Editors---Games and Decisions in Reliability and Risk
Decision Analysis
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
We deal with issues concerning negotiation support for group decisions over influence diagrams, when the group members disagree about utility and probability assessments. We base our discussion on a modification of the balanced increment solution, which guarantees a final negotiated Pareto optimal alternative. As in standard decision analysis textbooks, we deal first with negotiation tables, then with negotiation trees, and finally with negotiation influence diagrams. We show through an example that a naive application of the balanced increment method at each joint decision node in a dynamic decision-making problem, and, more generally, of any standard negotiation approach guaranteeing Pareto optimality, may lead to an inferior solution. Therefore, our strategy proposes computing first the set of nondominated alternatives followed by negotiating over that set.