Stackelberg scheduling strategies
STOC '01 Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
The complexity of computing a Nash equilibrium
Proceedings of the thirty-eighth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Computing the optimal strategy to commit to
EC '06 Proceedings of the 7th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
Settling the Complexity of Two-Player Nash Equilibrium
FOCS '06 Proceedings of the 47th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
Proceedings of the 6th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Playing games for security: an efficient exact algorithm for solving Bayesian Stackelberg games
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2
Quality-bounded solutions for finite Bayesian Stackelberg games: scaling up
The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3
Securing networks using game theory: algorithms and applications
The 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - Volume 3
Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research
Computing Stackelberg strategies in stochastic games
ACM SIGecom Exchanges
Game-theoretic question selection for tests
IJCAI'13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Computing optimal Stackelberg strategies in general two-player Bayesian games (not to be confused with Stackelberg strategies in routing games) is a topic that has recently been gaining attention, due to their application in various security and law enforcement scenarios. Earlier results consider the computation of optimal Stackelberg strategies, given that all the payoffs and the prior distribution over types are known. We extend these results in two different ways. First, we consider learning optimal Stackelberg strategies. Our results here are mostly positive. Second, we consider computing approximately optimal Stackelberg strategies. Our results here are mostly negative.