The competitiveness of on-line assignments
Journal of Algorithms
Achieving network optima using Stackelberg routing strategies
IEEE/ACM Transactions on Networking (TON)
On-line routing of virtual circuits with applications to load balancing and machine scheduling
Journal of the ACM (JACM)
Algorithmic mechanism design (extended abstract)
STOC '99 Proceedings of the thirty-first annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Stackelberg scheduling strategies
STOC '01 Proceedings of the thirty-third annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Tight bounds for worst-case equilibria
SODA '02 Proceedings of the thirteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
How much can taxes help selfish routing?
Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Electronic commerce
Computing Nash equilibria for scheduling on restricted parallel links
STOC '04 Proceedings of the thirty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing
Tolls for Heterogeneous Selfish Users in Multicommodity Networks and Generalized Congestion Games
FOCS '04 Proceedings of the 45th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science
(Almost) optimal coordination mechanisms for unrelated machine scheduling
Proceedings of the nineteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on Discrete algorithms
STACS'99 Proceedings of the 16th annual conference on Theoretical aspects of computer science
Coordination mechanisms for selfish scheduling
WINE'05 Proceedings of the First international conference on Internet and Network Economics
The price of anarchy for minsum related machine scheduling
WAOA'11 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Approximation and Online Algorithms
Inefficiency of Nash equilibria with parallel processing policy
Information Processing Letters
Hi-index | 0.89 |
In this paper, we formalize a natural but new coordination mechanism, named Parallel Processing Policy, and analyze the price of anarchy of the job scheduling game with this mechanism in different scheduling models. Specifically, we first show the existence of pure Nash equilibrium by constructing a potential function. Then we give upper bounds for the price of anarchy in various scheduling models, such as 2-1m for identical machines, O(logm) for related machines, O(logm) for restricted machines and O(m) for unrelated machines. On the negative side, we also give a lower bound of logm for the unrelated machines model. We believe that this mechanism may be very powerful since it is a combination of two well studied mechanisms, ShortestFirst and Makespan. So it is a very interesting open problem to explore the exact bounds of PoA for this coordination mechanism in different scheduling models.