Beyond the interface: encountering artifacts in use
Designing interaction
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
When second wave HCI meets third wave challenges
Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design
Hertzian Tales: Electronic Products, Aesthetic Experience, and Critical Design
FEATURE: Intimate interactions: online representation and software of the self
interactions - We must redesign professional design education for the 21st century
Feminist HCI: taking stock and outlining an agenda for design
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Identity, performativity, and HCI
CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
I just made love: the system and the subject of experience
CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Re-scripting interactive artefacts with feminine values
DPPI '11 Proceedings of the 2011 Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces
Designing (for) desire: a critical study of technosexuality in HCI
Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design
Hi-index | 0.00 |
At the birth of participatory design, there was a strong political consciousness surrounding the design of new technology, the design process in particular, establishing a rich set of methods and tools for user-centered design. Today, the term design has extended its scope of concern beyond the process of design and into how users interact with the designed product on a day-to-day basis. This paper is an attempt to call to attention the need for a new set of methods, attitudes and approaches, along with the existing, to discuss, analyze and reflect upon the politics at the interface. By presenting a critical analysis of two design cases, we elicit the importance of such an agenda and the implications for design in doing so. We use the Foucauldian notion of power to analyze the power relationships in these two cases and to articulate the politics at the interface. We conclude by emphasizing the need for furthering this agenda and outlining future work.