Comparing activity theory with distributed cognition for video analysis: beyond "kicking the tires"

Authors:
Eric P.S. Baumer;Bill Tomlinson
Affiliations:
Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, USA;University of California, Irvine, Irvine, California, USA
Venue:
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Year:
2011

Citing 11
Cited 1

Activity theory and human-computer interaction

Context and consciousness
Applying activity theory to video analysis: how to make sense of video data in human-computer interaction

Context and consciousness
Activity theory, cognitive ergonomics and distributed cognition: three views of a transport company

International Journal of Human-Computer Studies - Understanding work and designing artefacts
Coda and Response to Christine Halverson

Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Activity Theory and Distributed Cognition: Or What Does CSCW Need to DO with Theories?

Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Post-cognitivist HCI: second-wave theories

CHI '03 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design (Acting with Technology)

Acting with Technology: Activity Theory and Interaction Design (Acting with Technology)
How HCI interprets the probes

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
In-between theory and practice: dialogues in design research

CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Usability evaluation considered harmful (some of the time)

Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Complex mediation

Human-Computer Interaction

In search of theoretical foundations for UX research and practice

CHI '12 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.01

Visualization

Abstract

The field of HCI is growing, not only in the variety of application areas or the volume of research conducted, but also in the number of analytical approaches for use in the evaluation and design of interactive systems. However, despite the abundance of theoretical frameworks available, relatively little work has directly compared the application of these frameworks. This paper compares video analysis methods based on two analytic frameworks - activity theory (AT) and distributed cognition (DCog) - by performing an analysis of the same system from each of the two different theoretical perspectives. The results presented here provide a better understanding of how such theoretically informed methods in practice both resemble and differ from one another. Furthermore, this comparison enables specific insights about each of the theories themselves, as well as more general discussion about the role of theory in HCI.