Beyond Bandwidth: Dimensions of Connection in Interpersonal Communication
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
A Multiple View Approach to Support Common Ground in Distributed and Synchronous Geo-Collaboration
CMV '05 Proceedings of the Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization
ArtLinks: fostering social awareness and reflection in museums
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Articulating common ground in cooperative work: content and process
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
ConvoCons: Encouraging Affinity on Multitouch Interfaces
Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction. Part III: Ubiquitous and Intelligent Interaction
Momentum: getting and staying on topic during a brainstorm
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
ConvoCons: a tool for building affinity among distributed team members
Proceedings of the ACM 2012 conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Using surveys as a means for assessing group common ground has the possibility of social desirability bias where the results may suggest a higher team affinity rating than may actually exist. To evaluate efforts to improve affinity within interdisciplinary design teams, we developed an empirical measurement of affinity based on behavior and conversation in order to compare affinity differences between workgroups more precisely. This methodology can be used for remote or co-located teams and offers HCI researchers a more powerful method of evaluating group affinity.