Rectangle-packing-based module placement
ICCAD '95 Proceedings of the 1995 IEEE/ACM international conference on Computer-aided design
Parametrization and smooth approximation of surface triangulations
Computer Aided Geometric Design
MAPS: multiresolution adaptive parameterization of surfaces
Proceedings of the 25th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
Texture mapping progressive meshes
Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
Least squares conformal maps for automatic texture atlas generation
Proceedings of the 29th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
Globally smooth parameterizations with low distortion
ACM SIGGRAPH 2003 Papers
Digital Image Processing (3rd Edition)
Digital Image Processing (3rd Edition)
Objective and subjective evaluation of static 3D mesh compression
Image Communication
Hi-index | 0.00 |
We introduce a simple and innovative method to compare any two texture maps, regardless of their sizes, aspect ratios, or even masks, as long as they are both meant to be mapped onto the same 3D mesh. Our system is based on a zero-distortion 3D mesh unwrapping technique which compares two new adapted texture atlases with the same mask but different texel colors, and whose every texel covers the same area in 3D. Once these adapted atlases are created, we measure their difference with ITEM-RMSE, a slightly modified version of the standard RMSE defined for images. ITEM-RMSE is more meaningful and reliable than RMSE because it only takes into account the texels inside the mask, since they are the only ones that will actually be used during rendering. Our method is not only very useful to compare the space efficiency of different texture atlas generation algorithms, but also to quantify texture loss in compression schemes for multi-resolution textured 3D meshes.