Lead users: a source of novel product concepts
Management Science
Lead user analyses for the development of new industrial products
Management Science
Computer wars: how the west can win in a post-IBM world
Computer wars: how the west can win in a post-IBM world
On the criteria to be used in decomposing systems into modules
Communications of the ACM
Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions
Managing Intellectual Capital: Organizational, Strategic, and Policy Dimensions
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1
Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Volume 1
Platform Leadership
Introduction to VLSI Systems
Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman
Free Software, Free Society: Selected Essays of Richard M. Stallman
The Cathedral and the Bazaar
Determinants of User Innovation and Innovation Sharing in a Local Market
Management Science
The Economics of Knowledge
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom
Dynamic Mixed Duopoly: A Model Motivated by Linux vs. Windows
Management Science
Making Design Rules: A Multidomain Perspective
Organization Science
Mobility, Skills, and the Michigan Non-Compete Experiment
Management Science
Marginality and Problem-Solving Effectiveness in Broadcast Search
Organization Science
3D-live: live interactions through 3D visual environments
Proceedings of the 2012 Virtual Reality International Conference
Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we assess the economic viability of innovation by producers relative to two increasingly important alternative models: innovations by single-user individuals or firms and open collaborative innovation. We analyze the design costs and architectures and communication costs associated with each model. We conclude that both innovation by individual users and open collaborative innovation increasingly compete with and may displace producer innovation in many parts of the economy. We explain why this represents a paradigm shift with respect to innovation research, policy making, and practice. We discuss important implications and offer suggestions for further research.