Computer Networks and ISDN Systems - Protocol specification, testing and verification
Testing deterministic implementations from nondeterministic FSM specifications
Selected proceedings of the IFIP TC6 9th international workshop on Testing of communicating systems
Model checking
Comparing test sets and criteria in the presence of test hypotheses and fault domains
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
A Comparison of Some Structural Testing Strategies
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
A Formal Approach for Passive Testing of Protocol Data Portions
ICNP '02 Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols
Encoding PAMR into (Timed) EFSMs
FORTE '02 Proceedings of the 22nd IFIP WG 6.1 International Conference Houston on Formal Techniques for Networked and Distributed Systems
Fault Model-Driven Test Derivation from Finite State Models: Annotated Bibliography
MOVEP '00 Proceedings of the 4th Summer School on Modeling and Verification of Parallel Processes
A passive testing approach based on invariants: application to the WAP
Computer Networks: The International Journal of Computer and Telecommunications Networking
TestCom '08 / FATES '08 Proceedings of the 20th IFIP TC 6/WG 6.1 international conference on Testing of Software and Communicating Systems: 8th International Workshop
Verdict functions in testing with a fault domain or test hypotheses
ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology (TOSEM)
A formal methodology to test complex heterogeneous systems
ATVA'07 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Automated technology for verification and analysis
Derivation of a suitable finite test suite for customized probabilistic systems
FORTE'06 Proceedings of the 26th IFIP WG 6.1 international conference on Formal Techniques for Networked and Distributed Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
To ensure the conformance of an implementation under test (IUT) with respect to a specification requires, in general, the application of an infinite number of tests. In order to use finite test suites, most testing methodologies add some feasible hypotheses about the behavior of the IUT. Since these methodologies are designed for considering a fix set of hypotheses, they usually do not have the capability of dealing with other scenarios where the set of assumed hypotheses varies. We propose a logic to infer whether a set of observations (i.e., results of test applications) allows to claim that the IUT conforms to the specification if a specific set of hypotheses (taken from a repertory) is assumed.