A dolev-yao-based definition of abuse-free protocols

  • Authors:
  • Detlef Kähler;Ralf Küsters;Thomas Wilke

  • Affiliations:
  • Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel;Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel;Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel

  • Venue:
  • ICALP'06 Proceedings of the 33rd international conference on Automata, Languages and Programming - Volume Part II
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

We propose a Dolev-Yao-based definition of abuse freeness for optimistic contract-signing protocols which, unlike other definitions, incorporates a rigorous notion of what it means for an outside party to be convinced by a dishonest party that it has the ability to determine the outcome of the protocol with an honest party, i.e., to determine whether it will obtain a valid contract itself or whether it will prevent the honest party from obtaining a valid contract. Our definition involves a new notion of test (inspired by static equivalence) which the outside party can perform. We show that an optimistic contract-signing protocol proposed by Asokan, Shoup, and Waidner is abusive and that a protocol by Garay, Jakobsson, and MacKenzie is abuse-free according to our definition. Our analysis is based on a synchronous concurrent model in which parties can receive several messages at the same time. This results in new vulnerabilities of the protocols depending on how a trusted third party reacts in case it receives abort and resolve requests at the same time