Automatic 3d face recognition using discriminant common vectors

Authors:
Cheng Zhong;Tieniu Tan;Chenghua Xu;Jiangwei Li
Affiliations:
National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China;National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China;National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China;National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, P.R. China
Venue:
ICB'06 Proceedings of the 2006 international conference on Advances in Biometrics
Year:
2006

Citing 5
Cited 1

3D Human Face Recognition Using Point Signature

FG '00 Proceedings of the Fourth IEEE International Conference on Automatic Face and Gesture Recognition 2000
Face Recognition Based on Fitting a 3D Morphable Model

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Discriminative Common Vectors for Face Recognition

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
An Evaluation of Multimodal 2D+3D Face Biometrics

IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence
Automatic 3D face recognition combining global geometric features with local shape variation information

FGR' 04 Proceedings of the Sixth IEEE international conference on Automatic face and gesture recognition

Letters: Bimodal biometric verification based on face and lips

Neurocomputing

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

In this paper we propose a fully automatic scheme for 3D face recognition. In our scheme, the original 3D data is automatically converted into the normalized 3D data, then the discriminant common vector (DCV) is introduced for 3D face recognition. We also compare DCV with two common methods, i.e., principal component analysis (PCA) and linear discriminant analysis (LDA). Our experiments are based on the CASIA 3D Face Database, a challenging database with complex variations. The experimental results show that DCV is superior to the other two methods.