Resolving cognitive conflict in requirements definition: a blackboard-based model and system architecture

  • Authors:

  • Jeff Butterfield;Jay G. Cooprider;Sukumar Rathnam

  • Affiliations:

  • College of Business Administration, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX;College of Business Administration, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX;College of Business Administration, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX

  • Venue:
  • SIGCPR '94 Proceedings of the 1994 computer personnel research conference on Reinventing IS : managing information technology in changing organizations: managing information technology in changing organizations
  • Year:
  • 1994

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Many IS managers consider requirements definition to be one of the most difficult phases in a system analysis and design project. It is also felt that no other phase contributes as much to the potential success or failure of the final product. One of the reasons that a successful requirements analysis is so elusive is because the information needed for an accurate solution is distributed among the individual designers and domain experts that comprise the design team.Inherent in a requirements analysis are two problems: the actual problem of understanding and defining the artifact under design, and the problem of eliciting the ideas and information that each individual possesses and integrating these into a coherent and comprehensive design specification.This paper explores this problem of cognitive conflict within a requirements analysis domain. The characteristics of the problem are examined and a proposed process of resolution is considered. A blackboard-based framework is presented as a possible vehicle for implementing the proposed resolution scheme. The characteristics of the blackboard model are discussed and it's applicable features are examined in detail. The requirements of a system to support requirements analysis are presented along with the design details of BARD, a blackboard assisted requirements definition system. Implications for design and directions for future research are outlined.