Communications of the ACM
Linguistic mimicry and trust in text-based CMC
Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Journal of Management Information Systems
Proceedings of the 2010 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Inferring gender of movie reviewers: exploiting writing style, content and metadata
CIKM '10 Proceedings of the 19th ACM international conference on Information and knowledge management
Faceted identity, faceted lives: social and technical issues with being yourself online
Proceedings of the ACM 2011 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Examining knowledge contribution from the perspective of an online identity in blogging communities
Computers in Human Behavior
Echoes of power: language effects and power differences in social interaction
Proceedings of the 21st international conference on World Wide Web
What's congress doing on twitter?
Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Computational perspectives on social phenomena at global scales
IJCAI'13 Proceedings of the Twenty-Third international joint conference on Artificial Intelligence
Feminism and social media research
Proceedings of the companion publication of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Women and men communicate differently in both face-to-face and computer-mediated environments. We study linguistic patterns considered gendered in reviews contributed to the Internet Movie Database. IMDb has been described as a male-majority community, in which females contribute fewer reviews and enjoy less prestige than males. Analyzing reviews posted by prolific males and females, we hypothesize that females adjust their communication styles to be in sync with their male counterparts. We find evidence that while certain characteristics of "female language" persevere over time (e.g., frequent use of pronouns) others (e.g., hedging) decrease with time. Surprisingly, we also find that males often increase their use of "female" features. Our results indicate, that even when they resemble men's reviews linguistically, women's reviews still enjoy less prestige and smaller audiences.