Integrating variable-latency components into high-level synthesis

  • Authors:
  • V. Raghunathan;S. Ravi;G. Lakshminarayana

  • Affiliations:
  • Dept. of Electr. Eng., Indian Inst. of Technol., Chennai;-;-

  • Venue:
  • IEEE Transactions on Computer-Aided Design of Integrated Circuits and Systems
  • Year:
  • 2006

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.03

Visualization

Abstract

Components used as building blocks (e.g., functional units) in conventional HLS techniques are assumed to have fixed latency values. Variable-latency units exhibit the property that the number of cycles taken to compute their outputs varies depending on the input values. While variable-latency units offer potential for performance improvement, we demonstrate that realization of this potential requires that HLS be adapted suitably (sub-optimal use of variable-latency units can lead to performance degradation, or unnecessarily high area overheads). Our techniques to incorporate variable-latency units into HLS ensure that the performance improvement is maximized, while minimizing area overheads or satisfying resource constraints. These techniques are not restricted to specific HLS tools/algorithms, and can be plugged in to any generic HLS system. Since area overheads may still be incurred due to the use of variable-latency units, we present a novel technique, based on the concept of reduced variable-latency units, to further reduce area overheads. Reduced variable-latency units only implement the low-latency case behavior of complete variable-latency units. We demonstrate that the use of reduced variable-latency units significantly reduces area overheads, and sometimes results in improvements in performance while simultaneously reducing the area of the register transfer level implementation. Experimental results show that the proposed variable-latency-unit-based synthesis techniques achieve a performance improvement of up to 1.6× (average of 1.4×) over a state-of-the-art HLS tool, with minimal area overheads (average of 5.3%). The use of reduced variable-latency units leads to a performance improvement of up to 1.6× (average of 1.3×), with a simultaneous area reduction of up to 17.9% (10.6% on the average)