An Investigation into the design of an interface for interaction with a virtual environment representing a four-dimensional object

Authors:
R. Wellard;S. C. Chaman
Affiliations:
Physics Department, University of Warwick, Coventry;Physics Department, University of Warwick, Coventry
Venue:
EGVE'01 Proceedings of the 7th Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments & 5th Immersive Projection Technology
Year:
2001

Citing 10
Cited 0

Iterative design of an interface for easy 3-D direct manipulation

CHI '92 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
The perceptual structure of multidimensional input device selection

CHI '92 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Integrality and separability of input devices

ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Sensory-motor systems in virtual manipulation

Simulated and virtual realities
Designing in virtual reality: perception-action coupling and affordances

Simulated and virtual realities
Input devices and interaction techniques for advanced computing

Virtual environments and advanced interface design
A study in interactive 3-D rotation using 2-D control devices

SIGGRAPH '88 Proceedings of the 15th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques
Measuring Presence in Virtual Environments: A Presence Questionnaire

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
A semantic analysis of the design space of input devices

Human-Computer Interaction
Human performance evaluation of manipulation schemes in virtual environments

VRAIS '93 Proceedings of the 1993 IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Five methods of mapping the input from a six-degrees-of-freedom input device to the set of rotations available in four-dimensional space are evaluated with respect to how well they can be used to perform four-dimensional target aquisition tasks. Also evaluated are the user's opinions of the methods of interaction. Two of the five interaction methods perform significantly better than the rest allowing some general results to be drawn.....