What you look at is what you get: eye movement-based interaction techniques
CHI '90 Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use
International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction
SUITEKeys: a speech understanding interface for the motor-control challenged
Assets '98 Proceedings of the third international ACM conference on Assistive technologies
interactions
Adapting PCs for Disabilities
Mouse movements of motion-impaired users: a submovement analysis
Assets '04 Proceedings of the 6th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Facial feature tracking for cursor control
Journal of Network and Computer Applications
High-Performance Wide-Area Optical Tracking: The HiBall Tracking System
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments
Face as mouse through visual face tracking
Computer Vision and Image Understanding
Mixed-initiative dialog management for speech-based interaction with graphical user interfaces
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Hacking the Nintendo Wii Remote
IEEE Pervasive Computing
MarkerMouse: mouse cursor control using a head-mounted marker
ICCHP'10 Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Computers helping people with special needs
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
In this paper, we report on the Wii Multimodal system (WiiMS) a system which simulates mouse and keyboard interaction for motor-impaired users. The human interface is made through a head tracking pointer which consist of a Wii Remote control and Infra-Red LEDs attached to a pair of glasses. WiiMS combines the use of head tracking with speech recognition to provide a simple and easy-to-use user interface for users with motor impairments. A user study was carried out to investigate the following: learnability, intuitiveness, user satisfaction and effectiveness of the WiiMS. WiiMS was found to be learnable, effective, satisfactory and intuitive but was not efficient for text entry even though the proposed system was found to be adequate in the context of use.