Effects of conflicting aggregated rating on eWOM review credibility and diagnosticity: The moderating role of review valence

  • Authors:
  • Lingyun Qiu;Jun Pang;Kai H. Lim

  • Affiliations:
  • Guanghua School of Management, Peking University, 5 Yiheyuan Road, Beijing, 100871, PR China;School of Business, Renmin University of China, 59 Zhongguancun Avenue, Beijing, 100872, PR China;Department of Information Systems, City University of Hong Kong, 83 Tat Chee Avenue, Kowloon Tong, Hong Kong

  • Venue:
  • Decision Support Systems
  • Year:
  • 2012

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Most B2C websites provide consumers with two types of electronic Word-of-Mouth (eWOM) information, namely aggregated rating and individual review. The present research investigates the effects of a conflicting aggregated rating on the perceived credibility and diagnosticity of individual reviews. The results of our laboratory experiment demonstrate that the presence of a conflicting aggregated rating will decrease review credibility and diagnosticity via its negative effect on consumers' product-related attributions of the review. In addition, these effects are more salient for positive reviews than for negative ones. These findings contribute to a better understanding of the interactions between different types of eWOM information and provide practitioners with actionable suggestions on how to improve the design of their eWOM systems.