Volume visualization in the clinical practice

  • Authors:
  • Bernhard Kainz;Rupert H. Portugaller;Daniel Seider;Michael Moche;Philipp Stiegler;Dieter Schmalstieg

  • Affiliations:
  • Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision, Graz University of Technology, Austria;Department of Interventional Radiology, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Medical University Graz, Austria;Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany;Department of Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Leipzig, Germany;Department of Interventional Radiology, Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation Surgery, Medical University Graz, Austria;Institute for Computer Graphics and Vision, Graz University of Technology, Austria

  • Venue:
  • AE-CAI'11 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Augmented Environments for Computer-Assisted Interventions
  • Year:
  • 2011

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Volumetric data is common in medicine, geology and engineering, but the O(n3) complexity in data and algorithms has prevented the widespread use of volume graphics. Recently, 3D image processing and visualization algorithms have been parallelized and ported to graphics processing units. Today, medical diagnostics highly depends on volumetric imaging methods that must be visualized in real-time. However, daily clinical practice shows that physicians still prefer simple 2D multi-planar reconstructions over 3D visualizations for intervention planning. Therefore, a very basic question in this context is, if real-time 3D image synthesis is necessary at all. This paper makes four main observations in a clinical context, which are evaluated with 24 independent physicians from three different European hospitals.