The affordances of media spaces for collaboration
CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work
Beyond Bandwidth: Dimensions of Connection in Interpersonal Communication
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Using Augmented Reality to Treat Phobias
IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
An approach to assess the quality of collaboration in technology-mediated design situations
European Conference on Cognitive Ergonomics: Designing beyond the Product --- Understanding Activity and User Experience in Ubiquitous Environments
Measurement and assessment in computer-supported collaborative learning
Computers in Human Behavior
Design and evaluation guidelines for mental health technologies
Interacting with Computers
Interacting with Computers
A closer look on social presence as a causing factor in computer-mediated collaboration
Computers in Human Behavior
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
INTERACT'11 Proceedings of the 13th IFIP TC 13 international conference on Human-computer interaction - Volume Part I
Hi-index | 0.00 |
A growing number of empirical studies evaluate the influence of Mental Health (MH) technology on the clinical effectiveness, the therapeutic relationship (i.e., therapeutic alliance), and usability issues. However, to the authors' knowledge, no studies have yet been performed regarding the influence of technology on the therapeutic process in terms of collaboration. This study evaluates the quality of collaboration between the client and therapist in Augmented Reality Exposure Therapy (ARET) context and the traditional, In Vivo Exposure Therapy (IVET) context with the Therapeutic Collaborative Scale (TCS). Twenty participants received an intensive session of cognitive behavioral therapy in either a technology-mediated therapeutic context or in a traditional therapeutic context. The results indicate that both therapeutic conditions show high collaboration scores. However, the asymmetry of roles between the therapist and the client under both conditions were detected. Also, a greater level of distraction was observed for therapists in ARET, which affected the quality of the therapists' involvement in the therapeutic session. The implications of these results are discussed.