Optimal static 2-dimensional screen subdivision for parallel rasterization architectures

  • Authors:
  • Donald McManus;Carl Beckmann

  • Affiliations:
  • Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover and Sanders, a Lockheed Martin Co., Nashua, NH;Thayer School of Engineering, Dartmouth College, Hanover and Sanders, a Lockheed Martin Co., Nashua, NH

  • Venue:
  • EGGH'96 Proceedings of the Eleventh Eurographics conference on Graphics Hardware
  • Year:
  • 1996

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

Designers of computer graphics hardware have used increasing device counts available from IC manufacturers to increase parallelism using techniques such as putting a longer pipeline of data path elements on integrated circuits or developing designs which use an array of processors. Pixel-Planes 1-5 and PixelFlow are examples of architectures which use an array of pixel processors for rasterization. Early generations of Pixel- Planes attempted to make these arrays as large as the display providing one processor for each display pixel. Later generations improved performance by grouping processors into multiple smaller arrays, subdividing the screen into sections of a corresponding size and having the arrays independently process the screen subdivisions. This paper describes simulations which were performed to determine the optimum size subdivision for a graphics computer which uses Pixel-Planes type parallelism. i.e. static two dimensional screen subdivision parallel polygon rasterization. We then develop a mathematical approach to determining the optimal subdivision size and show that it agrees well with the experimental data. For special purpose architectures we show that the optimal size depends not only on the polygon size but also on the silicon area consumed by the rasterizer overhead. The mathematical approach can be directly applied to special purpose architectures. and we show how it can be modified for use in analyzing algorithms developed for general purpose architectures such as the Intel Touchstone or Paragon or the Thinking Machines CM-5.