The affective reasoner: a process model of emotions in a multi-agent system
The affective reasoner: a process model of emotions in a multi-agent system
The BOID architecture: conflicts between beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires
Proceedings of the fifth international conference on Autonomous agents
FLAME—Fuzzy Logic Adaptive Model of Emotions
Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems
ALMA: a layered model of affect
Proceedings of the fourth international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems
Continual planning and acting in dynamic multiagent environments
PCAR '06 Proceedings of the 2006 international symposium on Practical cognitive agents and robots
Goals in agent systems: a unifying framework
Proceedings of the 7th international joint conference on Autonomous agents and multiagent systems - Volume 2
Interactive Storytelling with Literary Feelings
ACII '07 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction
An architecture for directing value-driven artificial characters
Agents for games and simulations II
BDI agent programming in agentspeak using Jason
CLIMA'05 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on Computational Logic in Multi-Agent Systems
A domain-independent framework for modeling emotion
Cognitive Systems Research
EMA: A process model of appraisal dynamics
Cognitive Systems Research
Emotional appraisal of moral dilemma in characters
ICIDS'12 Proceedings of the 5th international conference on Interactive Storytelling
Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
This paper presents a model of agent's behavior that takes into account emotions and moral values. In our proposal, when the description of the current situation reveals that a moral value is 'at stake', the moral goal of re-establishing the threatened value is included among the active goals. The compliance with values generates positive emotions like pride and admiration, while the opposite brings to shame and self-reproach. During the deliberation phase, the agent appraises her plans in terms of the emotional reward they are expected to yield, given the trade off between moral and individual goals. In this phase, the emotional reward affects the agent's choices about her behavior. After the execution phase, one's and others' actions are appraised again in terms of the agent's values, giving rise to moral emotions. The paper shows how emotional appraisal can be coupled with the choice among possible lines of action, presenting a mapping between plans and emotions that integrates and extends preceding proposals.