Contrasting meta-learning and hyper-heuristic research: the role of evolutionary algorithms

  • Authors:

  • Gisele L. Pappa;Gabriela Ochoa;Matthew R. Hyde;Alex A. Freitas;John Woodward;Jerry Swan

  • Affiliations:

  • Computer Science Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil 31270-010;Computing Science and Mathematics, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK FK9 4LA;School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK NR4 7TJ;School of Computing, University of Kent, Kent, UK CT2 7NF;Computing Science and Mathematics, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK FK9 4LA;Computing Science and Mathematics, University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland, UK FK9 4LA

  • Venue:
  • Genetic Programming and Evolvable Machines
  • Year:
  • 2014

Quantified Score

Hi-index 0.00

Visualization

Abstract

The fields of machine meta-learning and hyper-heuristic optimisation have developed mostly independently of each other, although evolutionary algorithms (particularly genetic programming) have recently played an important role in the development of both fields. Recent work in both fields shares a common goal, that of automating as much of the algorithm design process as possible. In this paper we first provide a historical perspective on automated algorithm design, and then we discuss similarities and differences between meta-learning in the field of supervised machine learning (classification) and hyper-heuristics in the field of optimisation. This discussion focuses on the dimensions of the problem space, the algorithm space and the performance measure, as well as clarifying important issues related to different levels of automation and generality in both fields. We also discuss important research directions, challenges and foundational issues in meta-learning and hyper-heuristic research. It is important to emphasize that this paper is not a survey, as several surveys on the areas of meta-learning and hyper-heuristics (separately) have been previously published. The main contribution of the paper is to contrast meta-learning and hyper-heuristics methods and concepts, in order to promote awareness and cross-fertilisation of ideas across the (by and large, non-overlapping) different communities of meta-learning and hyper-heuristic researchers. We hope that this cross-fertilisation of ideas can inspire interesting new research in both fields and in the new emerging research area which consists of integrating those fields.