Understanding computers and cognition
Understanding computers and cognition
Semistructured messages are surprisingly useful for computer-supported coordination
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication
Plans and situated actions: the problem of human-machine communication
A theory of computer semiotics: semiotic approaches to construction and assessment of computer systems
Experiments with Oval: a radically tailorable tool for cooperative work
CSCW '92 Proceedings of the 1992 ACM conference on Computer-supported cooperative work
The interdisciplinary study of coordination
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Experiments with Oval: a radically tailorable tool for cooperative work
ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS)
Coordination mechanisms: towards a conceptual foundation of CSCW systems design
Computer Supported Cooperative Work - Special issue on the design of cooperative systems
Workflow Systems: Occasions for Success and Failure
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Work, locales and distributed social worlds
ECSCW'95 Proceedings of the fourth conference on European Conference on Computer-Supported Cooperative Work
Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Keeping Found Things Found: The Study and Practice of Personal Information Management: The Study and Practice of Personal Information Management
Affording Mechanisms: An Integrated View of Coordination and Knowledge Management
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Re-coordinating activities: an investigation of articulation work in patient transfers
Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Constructing CSCW: The First Quarter Century
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The choice of communicative modality will greatly affect the way cooperative work is coordinated. Computer supported coordination brings about changes to communicative modalities-often the change is from oral to artifact based coordination. In order to inform the designed changes in modality we need to understand the characteristics of individual modes of coordination, and we need to compare modes before changes are implemented. Within this context the paper has two objectives: (1) to characterize oral and artifact based coordination, and (2) to establish an initial set of dimensions which will support a comparison between the two modes of coordination. The basis for both points is empirical: a field study of oral coordination in maritime operations, and a study of artifact based coordination in software engineering.