Designing the user interface (videotape)
Designing the user interface (videotape)
Building an electronic community system
Journal of Management Information Systems
Groupware and social dynamics: eight challenges for developers
Communications of the ACM
Surface modification tools in a virtual environment interface to a scanning probe microscope
I3D '95 Proceedings of the 1995 symposium on Interactive 3D graphics
Groupware in the wild: lessons learned from a year of virtual collocation
CSCW '96 Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Your place or mine? Learning from long-term use of audio-video communication
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
A usability study of workspace awareness widgets
Conference Companion on Human Factors in Computing Systems
The effects of gaze awareness on dialogue in a video-based collaborative manipulative task
CHI 98 Cconference Summary on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Enabling distributed collaborative science
CSCW '00 Proceedings of the 2000 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
A Review of Groupware Evaluations
WETICE '00 Proceedings of the 9th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises
Using Innovation Diffusion Theory to Guide Collaboration Technology Evaluation: Work in Progress
WETICE '01 Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Workshops on Enabling Technologies: Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises
Managing Collaboration in the nanoManipulator
VR '03 Proceedings of the IEEE Virtual Reality 2003
Human-Computer Interaction
Managing collaboration in the nanomanipulator
Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments - Special issue: IEEE VR 2003
CSCW '04 Proceedings of the 2004 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work
Information Processing and Management: an International Journal
Supporting creativity in distributed scientific communities
GROUP '05 Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on Supporting group work
Hands-on, simulated, and remote laboratories: A comparative literature review
ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR)
Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
Constructing reality: A study of remote, hands-on, and simulated laboratories
ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI)
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
Designing for e-science: Requirements gathering for collaboration in CiteSeer
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
The whys, how tos, and pitfalls of user studies
ACM SIGGRAPH 2009 Courses
ICVR'07 Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on Virtual reality
Research on virtual experiment intelligent-tutoring system based on multi-agent
Edutainment'10 Proceedings of the Entertainment for education, and 5th international conference on E-learning and games
Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab
Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology
EGVE'08 Proceedings of the 14th Eurographics conference on Virtual Environments
Supporting Scientific Collaboration: Methods, Tools and Concepts
Computer Supported Cooperative Work
Hi-index | 0.00 |
The evaluation of scientific collaboratories has lagged behind their development. Do the capabilities afforded by collaboratories outweigh their disadvantages? To evaluate a scientific collaboratory system, we conducted a repeated-measures controlled experiment that compared the outcomes and process of scientific work completed by 20 pairs of participants (upper level undergraduate science students) working face-to-face and remotely. We collected scientific outcomes (graded lab reports) to investigate the quality of scientific work, post-questionnaire data to measure the adoptability of the system, and post-interviews to understand the participants' views of doing science under both conditions. We hypothesized that study participants would be less effective, report more difficulty, and be less favorably inclined to adopt the system when collaborating remotely. Contrary to expectations, the quantitative data showed no statistically significant differences with respect to effectiveness and adoption.The qualitative data helped explain this null result: participants reported advantages and disadvantages working under both conditions and developed work-arounds to cope with the perceived disadvantages of collaborating remotely. While the data analysis produced null results, considered as a whole, the analysis leads us to conclude there is positive potential for the development and adoption of scientific collaboratory systems.