Designing for usability: key principles and what designers think
Communications of the ACM
The case against user interface consistency
Communications of the ACM
Cognitive systems engineering
Engineering design: a synthesis of views
Engineering design: a synthesis of views
The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.)
The sciences of the artificial (3rd ed.)
Visualizing a discipline: an author co-citation analysis of information science, 1972–1995
Journal of the American Society for Information Science
Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work
Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-Based Work
The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction
The Psychology of Human-Computer Interaction
Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts
Work-Oriented Design of Computer Artifacts
Designing interactivity for the specific context of designerly collaborations
CHI '05 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
How do design and evaluation interrelate in HCI research?
DIS '06 Proceedings of the 6th conference on Designing Interactive systems
Design rationale: the rationale and the barriers
Proceedings of the 4th Nordic conference on Human-computer interaction: changing roles
Usability professionals-current practices and future development
Interacting with Computers
The lonesome cowboy: A study of the usability designer role in systems development
Interacting with Computers
Supporting design studio culture in HCI
CHI '07 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Building theory in the sciences of the artificial
Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology
Journal of Systems and Software
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Design is a term that brings many people together. Collectively, we distinguish ourselves from others by the fact that we are designers and members of a design community. But, design is also a term that pushes people apart. The design that some value in the new fashions in the boutiques in Milan is not seen by everyone as design. While some are impressed with the design of a new telephone, not everyone sees this as design. As a community, we believe design is important. But, as a community, we do not have a common definition of what it is. Many views of design have been proposed. Several classifications of design have been proposed. In this paper, we also seek to classify views on design. Unlike earlier efforts, however, we want to find the classification that the global community of designers uses. To this end, we examine the patterns of citations to key authors' works (Author Co-citation Analysis) to uncover this classification and identify seven key author clusters representing identifiable theory groups or schools of thought/practice in design.