The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.)
The mythical man-month (anniversary ed.)
Curriculum recommendations for undergraduate programs in information systems
Communications of the ACM
A tool for program grading: The Jacksonville university scale
SIGCSE '83 Proceedings of the fourteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
A tool for program grading: The Jacksonville university scale
SIGCSE '83 Proceedings of the fourteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Recommendations for software engineering education
SIGCSE '87 Proceedings of the eighteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
SIGCSE '87 Proceedings of the eighteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Choosing group projects for advanced systems courses
SIGCSE '88 Proceedings of the nineteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
“Cactus Systems”: a computer science practicum that is more than a capstone
SIGCSE '88 Proceedings of the nineteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Comparison of techniques in project-based courses
SIGCSE '85 Proceedings of the sixteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
The evolution of a project oriented course in software development
SIGCSE '85 Proceedings of the sixteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Evaluating student teams developing unique industry projects
ACE '05 Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 42
Self and peer assessment in software engineering projects
ACE '05 Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 42
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Evaluating individual students is especially difficult in a Directed Project course because the content is dictated by the projects rather than by a fixed syllabus. By merging the evaluation process with the project management tasks, and by using prepared checklists for peer, task, and meeting evaluations, students working in a group may be evaluated as individuals and the same grading criteria may be applied to all students even though they are working on different projects.