Introduction to the personal software process
Introduction to the personal software process
Supporting and evaluating team dynamics in group projects
SIGCSE '99 The proceedings of the thirtieth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Evaluating individuals in team projects
Proceedings of the thirty-first SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
A diagnostic technique for addressing group performance in capstone projects
Proceedings of the 7th annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Introductory programming, criterion-referencing, and bloom
SIGCSE '03 Proceedings of the 34th SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Evaluating individual contribution toward group software engineering projects
Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering
Managing and evaluating students in a directed project course
SIGSCE '84 Proceedings of the fifteenth SIGCSE technical symposium on Computer science education
Object-oriented analysis, criterion referencing, and Bloom
ACE '04 Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 30
Employer satisfaction with ICT graduates
ACE '04 Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 30
Evaluating student teams developing unique industry projects
ACE '05 Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 42
Autorating: getting individual marks from team marks and enhancing teamwork
FIE '95 Proceedings of the Frontiers in Education Conference, on 1995. Proceedings., 1995 - Volume 02
FIE '98 Proceedings of the 28th Annual Frontiers in Education - Volume 01
Incorporating student peer review and feedback into the assessment process
FIE '98 Proceedings of the 28th Annual Frontiers in Education - Volume 01
Improving student learning through the use of multisource assessment and feedback
FIE '00 Proceedings of the 30th Annual Frontiers in Education - Volume 01
A structured approach for managing a practical software engineering course
FIE '00 Proceedings of the 30th Annual Frontiers in Education - Volume 01
Evaluating student teams developing unique industry projects
ACE '05 Proceedings of the 7th Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 42
Quantitative peer assessment: can students be objective?
ACE '07 Proceedings of the ninth Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 66
Student timesheets can aid in curriculum coordination
ACE '07 Proceedings of the ninth Australasian conference on Computing education - Volume 66
A collaborative and experiential learning model powered by real-world projects
SIGITE '08 Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGITE conference on Information technology education
Assessing collaborative and experiential learning
Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges
Ten years of the Australasian Computing Education Conference
ACE '09 Proceedings of the Eleventh Australasian Conference on Computing Education - Volume 95
Mining student capstone projects with FRASR and ProM
Proceedings of the ACM international conference companion on Object oriented programming systems languages and applications companion
Capstone project: fair, just and accountable assessment
Proceedings of the 17th ACM annual conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
Students' perceptions of peer evaluation in project work
ACE '11 Proceedings of the Thirteenth Australasian Computing Education Conference - Volume 114
Capstone project online assessment tool without the paper work
Proceedings of the 18th ACM conference on Innovation and technology in computer science education
An assessment model for large project courses
Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Team software engineering projects can enhance student learning and commitment, but it is challenging to determine a method of assessment that assesses the intended learning outcomes; particularly when assessing teamwork and an individual's contribution to the team's work. The students themselves are often the best source of meaningful data, and self and peer assessment is a valuable part of the whole assessment scheme. To ensure the integrity of the final grade it is necessary to use a variety of tools and to check the correlation between data from different sources. To increase the learning opportunities it is useful to repeat some assessment tasks during the course. However, this can be time-consuming for the lecturer to collate and analyse, and providing timely feedback to the students is difficult. Web-based peer assessment offers an opportunity to provide quality, timely feedback in a way that is manageable by the lecturer.