Computing and organizations: what we know and what we don't know
Communications of the ACM - Special section on management of information systems
Computer mediated work: the interplay between technology and structured jobs
Communications of the ACM - Special section on management of information systems
In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power
In the age of the smart machine: the future of work and power
Computerization, productivity, and quality of work-life
Communications of the ACM
An examination of the correlates of burnout in information systems professionals
Information Resources Management Journal
Power, politics, and MIS implementation
Communications of the ACM
Development of an instrument to measure stress among software professionals: factor analytic study
SIGMIS CPR '03 Proceedings of the 2003 SIGMIS conference on Computer personnel research: Freedom in Philadelphia--leveraging differences and diversity in the IT workforce
Journal of Management Information Systems - Special section: The impacts of business process change on organizational performance
Journal of Management Information Systems
Hi-index | 0.00 |
By applying Karasek's Job Demand/Control model, this paper examines the antecedents, moderators and consequences of IT-related workplace stress. While the topic of stress continues to interest IS researchers, there has been a lack of a cumulative tradition, in terms of the specific theoretical frameworks used to understand the problem. Drawing on recent insights about the determinants of workplace stress, our research includes both work stress sources as well as employees' autonomy/ control over their work to anticipate the consequences of stress IT users experience in their work. We examine how users who are assimilating new IT into their work experience the level of work-related demands in their jobs, the level of autonomy/ control they have over their work, and how these relate to outcomes, such as job dissatisfaction and mental health complaints (i.e., symptoms of depression). Our results show that negative consequences are moderated by the amount of autonomy that employees experience in their work.