Designating required vs. optional input fields

Authors:
Thomas S. Tullis;Ana Pons
Affiliations:
Human Interface Design, Fidelity Investments, Boston, MA;Human Interface Design, Fidelity Investments, Boston, MA
Venue:
CHI EA '97 CHI '97 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Year:
1997

Citing 1
Cited 5

Windows Interface Guidelines for Software Design

Windows Interface Guidelines for Software Design

Error prevention in online forms: Use color instead of asterisks to mark required-fields

Interacting with Computers
Enhancing online forms: Use format specifications for fields with format restrictions to help respondents

Interacting with Computers
Working towards usable forms on the worldwide web: optimizing multiple selection interface elements

Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
Working towards usable forms on the world wide web: optimizing date entry input fields

Advances in Human-Computer Interaction
User-friendly locations of error messages in web forms: Put them on the right side of the erroneous input field

Interacting with Computers

Quantified Score

Hi-index	0.00

Visualization

Abstract

This paper describes a study comparing different techniques for visually distingishing required from optional input fields in a form-filling application. Seven techniques were studied: no indication, bold field labels, chevrons in front of the labels, check marks to the right of the input fields, a different background color, grouping them separately, and a status bar indication. Performance and preference data were collected. In general, we found that the two worst methods were no indication and the status bar. The best method was separate groups.