Using protocol analysis to study the user interface
Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science
Using think aloud protocol with blind users:: a case for inclusive usability evaluation methods
Proceedings of the 8th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Computers in Entertainment (CIE) - Interactive TV
E-learning accessibility for the deaf and hard of hearing - practical examples and experiences
USAB'10 Proceedings of the 6th international conference on HCI in work and learning, life and leisure: workgroup human-computer interaction and usability engineering
Improving multimodal web accessibility for deaf people: sign language interpreter module
Multimedia Tools and Applications
Improving deaf accessibility in remote usability testing
The proceedings of the 13th international ACM SIGACCESS conference on Computers and accessibility
Proceedings of the 23rd Australian Computer-Human Interaction Conference
SWift: a SignWriting improved fast transcriber
Proceedings of the International Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces
Luz, Câmera, libras!: how a mobile game can improve the learning of sign languages
DUXU'13 Proceedings of the Second international conference on Design, User Experience, and Usability: health, learning, playing, cultural, and cross-cultural user experience - Volume Part II
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Usability is an important step in the software and product design cycle. There are a number of methodologies such as talk aloud protocol, and cognitive walkthrough that can be employed in usability evaluations. However, many of these methods are not designed to include users with disabilities. Legislation and good design practice should provide incentives for researchers in this field to consider more inclusive methodologies. We carried out two studies to explore the viability of collecting gestural protocols from sign language users who are deaf using the think aloud protocol (TAP) method. Results of our studies support the viability of gestural TAP as a usability evaluation method and provide additional evidence that the cognitive systems used to produce successful verbal protocols in people who are hearing seem to work similarly in people who speak with gestures. The challenges for adapting the TAP method for gestural language relate to how the data was collected and not to the data or its analysis.