Ten myths of multimodal interaction
Communications of the ACM
Interaction Design
A Guide to Usability: Human Factors in Computing
A Guide to Usability: Human Factors in Computing
Describing the emotional states that are expressed in speech
Speech Communication - Special issue on speech and emotion
Emotions, speech and the ASR framework
Speech Communication - Special issue on speech and emotion
Vocal communication of emotion: a review of research paradigms
Speech Communication - Special issue on speech and emotion
Using speech and dialogue for interactive TV navigation
Universal Access in the Information Society
International Journal of Human-Computer Studies
Five qualitative research methods to make iTV applications universally accessible
Universal Access in the Information Society
User interface evaluation of interactive TV: a media studies perspective
Universal Access in the Information Society
Affective understanding in film
IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
Designing new interfaces for digital interactive television usable by older adults
Computers in Entertainment (CIE) - Social television and user interaction
Designing a model human cochlea: issues and challenges in crossmodal audio-haptic displays
Proceedings of the 2008 Ambi-Sys workshop on Haptic user interfaces in ambient media systems
Proceedings of the 1st international conference on Designing interactive user experiences for TV and video
The Evolution of TV Systems, Content, and Users Toward Interactivity
Foundations and Trends in Human-Computer Interaction
The coffee lab: developing a public usability space
CHI '10 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems
Accessibility Evaluation of Classroom Captions
ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing (TACCESS)
| Hi-index | 0.00 |
Television and film have become important equalization mechanisms for the dissemination and distribution of cultural materials. Closed captioning has allowed people who are deaf and hard of hearing to be included as audience members. However, some of the audio information such as music, sound effects, and speech prosody are not generally provided for in captioning. To include some of this information in closed captions, we generated graphical representations of the emotive information that is normally represented with nondialog sound. Eleven deaf and hard of hearing viewers watched two different video clips containing static and dynamic enhanced captions and compared them with conventional closed captions of the same clips. These viewers then provided verbal and written feedback regarding positive and negative aspects of the various captions. We found that hard of hearing viewers were significantly more positive about this style of captioning than deaf viewers and that some viewers believed that these augmentations were useful and enhanced their viewing experience.