Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
Visualizing argumentation: software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making
Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments
Arguing to Learn: Confronting Cognitions in Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning Environments
Computers & Education - Methodological issue in researching CSCL
Why scaffolding should sometimes make tasks more difficult for learners
CSCL '02 Proceedings of the Conference on Computer Support for Collaborative Learning: Foundations for a CSCL Community
Analyzing collaborative learning: multiple approaches to understanding processes and outcomes
ICLS '06 Proceedings of the 7th international conference on Learning sciences
Design of argument diagramming for case-based group learning
Proceedings of the 14th European conference on Cognitive ergonomics: invent! explore!
ICLS'08 Proceedings of the 8th international conference on International conference for the learning sciences - Volume 3
Argumentation scheme and shared online diagramming in case-based collaborative learning
CSCL'09 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Volume 1
The effects of task characteristics on online discussion
CSCL'09 Proceedings of the 9th international conference on Computer supported collaborative learning - Volume 1
Hi-index | 0.00 |
Knowing how to argue is a prerequisite to participation in scientific discourse. In argumentative knowledge construction, learners collaboratively construct and engage in arguments with the goal of learning to argue within a domain. Students have difficulties, however, constructing and evaluating arguments. Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) attempts to address these difficulties by providing students with additional resources and tools to visualize and guide their argumentation. This symposium presents results from empirical studies on facilitating and analyzing argumentative knowledge construction in CSCL. These studies assess the structural and conceptual quality of learners' arguments; provide sequential analyses of how learners exchange arguments in discourse, and investigate the relationship between cognitive processes of learners and the construction of arguments in discourse.